As a person with DBS, I would definitely say yes! I have no regrets about my decision, and personally benefit greatly from it, but am aware of cases where it may not have been appropriate for others. In fact, I was recently asked by my DBS team to speak with another candidate about his concerns with the procedure. After some discussion I recommended he put off the surgery for now.
But think about it ... a specialized team of doctors and therapists are assembled to evaluate and treat DBS candidates. Some of these centers are without a doubt better than others, yet in any case it is quite an expense. They know of the great possibilities and are anxious to spread their good deeds. But now, 16 years after being approved by the US FDA, more centers are competing for potential candidates. Pioneers in the field are being joined by others and they all need to show a return on investment. All while the pool of potential traditional candidates is shrinking. There is bound to be some "aggressive" players in the field looking to expand their horizons. Check out this article:
The article also touches on the ethics of DBS , especially due to its psychosocial effects.
I hear of many failures in this procedure and considered them myself. But I was to the point where I felt there was nothing to lose. My dyskinesia was debilitating and dystonia so bad I could only writhe in bed for hours every evening. Never mind the many other common symptoms. For some of us it is a "no brainer". Others, ?