Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'treatments'.

More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Forum Information
    • Discussion Corner Announcements
    • PF Forum Member Service Center
    • Frequently Asked Questions - How Do I...???
  • Medical Questions
    • Ask The Doctor
    • Ask The Surgical Team
    • Ask about Nutrition
    • Ask the Pharmacist
    • Pregúntele al Médico
    • Talk To A Speech Clinician
  • Unmoderated Discussion
    • Open Forum
    • Newly Diagnosed
    • Caregivers Forum
    • Young Onset Forum
    • DBS Forum

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start





Website URL







Found 1 result

  1. Today I would like to begin answering this question based on my own personal experiences. I would also like to initiate dialog with people whose lives have been affected by these disorders and people who have actively searched for answers to this question. I became a biophysicist because I wanted to define the magic of life with mathematical models. Finding treatments for diseases was not something I had ever given much serious thought to. Then, within a few years, several eye-opening events took place and changed my views on what was important in my work. Early on, I lost a young colleague to a heart condition. My colleague’s death was a devastating loss not only for me but for everyone who knew him. It was an even more devastating loss for his family, because he was the fourth of five brothers succumbing to the same heart ailment. I, however, was certain that modern medicine had done everything it could do to save my colleague’s life. After all, my colleague had three heart surgeries and several devices implanted. Furthermore, his father was a physician, and I was positive he had uncovered all medical treatments that could save his son’s life. A few years had gone by, and I hadn’t given much thought to my colleague’s heart condition. Then, as I was settling into a new position, preparing my lectures for medical students, I came across some astonishing information. One of the topics I was assigned to cover was channelopathies. Channelopathies are disorders caused by defects in the structure and function of different ion channels. The ion channels are signaling molecules in the cell membrane that allow neighboring cells to communicate with each other. As I was reviewing the scientific literature, I came across studies that had identified my colleague’s heart condition. Had the cardiologists who treated my colleague read the same studies, they would have known that some of the devices they implanted did not benefit my colleague, but rather that they contributed to his death. At this point, I realized that what I do and learn as a biophysicist can translate into effective treatments for some of the most devastating disorders. At the same time, I recognized the presence of the dangerous gap between scientific research and current medicine even when the two target the same medical condition. One cannot help but wonder how many lives are lost in this gap. One thing for sure, I constantly wondered about the toll this gap had on many human lives. Therefore three years ago when we discovered a vast signaling network in the brain that controls motion and cognition, we went into overdrive to characterize this network. We established that current medications that slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease work through this same network. Furthermore, we found ways to enhance the effects of such medications. Finally, we established that the progression of Parkinson’s disease and the escalation of L-DOPA induced dyskinesia are results of the deterioration of this brain network. However, when I tried to publish the results of our work and make this knowledge available to the entire scientific community, I was stopped by anonymous reviewers of our work. Scientific publishing is a difficult process – every scientist is well aware of this fact. My initial reaction was to provide all additional data requested by the reviewers in order to have our discovery published so that the floodgates of development of new treatments for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases would open. Two years later, I realized that our critics would never be satisfied with our data because our work has nothing to do with the established theory of neurodegeneration and formation of amyloid plaques in the brain. In response, I formed Cognistrata Inc. (www.cognistrata.org) with the mission to translate our scientific discovery into new treatments for neurodegenerative disorders. I also decided to turn directly for financial help to the families whose lives are affected by Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. In my next blog entry I will explain why no one was able to discover this brain network before we stumbled upon it. But first, I would like to initiate a dialog and hear directly from you. Does it matter to you who will develop effective treatments for Alzheimer’s disease? Would you support a woman biophysicist in her quest to find such treatments? Does it matter to you that most of the work that enabled us to discover the brain network was done in the heart? Or you would rather support the road well-traveled and the $400 million a year money pit focused on amyloid plaques research? I would like to hear your voice and your thoughts publicly or privately (just press the Contact us button at www.cognistrata.org). Thank you. Tatyana Ivanova-Nikolova, Ph.D. Principal Investigator and President of Cognistrata Inc.